|
|
Dear friends and colleagues of ELINAS,
With our third newsletter we would like to inform you of the latest ELINAS activities, and of relevant events associated with our cooperation partners on the topic of "Literature and Science."
We are delighted to announce the second volume of the ELINAS book series on Literature and Science from De Gruyter: "Quarks and Letters: Science in Contemporary Literature and Culture," which emerged from one of the lecture series at Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg. We thank all of our authors for their contributions!
"Dark Energy" is the focus of the second issue of the literary magazine "Seitenstechen," founded in 2015 by the new publisher Homunculus. ELINAS is the co-editor of this magazine issue. We would be very grateful if you could distribute the call for contributions as widely as possible.
We are also pleased to inform you of the Calls for Papers and conferences of the Society for the History of Science, the Academia Europaea in Freiburg, the British Society for Literature and Science, and OMETECA, the Society for Humanities and Sciences.
With best wishes for the semester break, and happy reading,
Aura Heydenreich, Klaus Mecke and the ELINAS team
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume 2 of the ELINAS book series: Quarks and Letters: Science in Contemporary Literature and Culture. Publication: November 2015 ISBN: 978-3-11-040654-2
Questions and answers from neuroscience, quantum mechanics and evolutionary theory feed into novels, and physics and biologists use rhetorical figures in order to communicate or even to generate their knowledge. That literary and scientific interests are not incommensurable, but are in essence unified, was still taken for granted in the eras of Kepler, Lichtenberg and Goethe. An extraordinary collaboration between the departments of physics and literary studies within the ELINAS research center is working towards making this idea more generally evident, as it has remained for many contemporary authors -- such as Richard Powers, Thomas Lehr or Raoul Schrott. The contributions to the series are devoted on the one hand to scientific topics in literary texts -- as in the novels of Richard Powers (USA), Can Hue (China) or Raoul Schrott (Germany). On the other hand, they also illuminate the roles that aesthetics plays in literature and the sciences.
Aura Heydenreich and Klaus Mecke: Literary Studies and Natural Science – Knowledge cultures in interaction; A plea for an interactional discourse zone between epistemic communities
Part I: Physics and Mathematics — Rhetoric and Ästhetics of Scientific Language
Klaus Mecke: Number and Narrative: Metaphors in Knowledge Process of Physics Abstract: An attempt should be made to grasp the scientific description of phenomena as a metaphorical process, which makes possible the transference of quantitative concepts to various physical realms of experience, through measurement narratives. Natural laws can then be understood as „synonymous quantitative metaphors,“ without having to make ontological reference to real-world objects and their properties. This epistemological perspective will not only clarify the significance of metaphors for scientific research, but also enable natural-scientific knowledge – formulas in particular – to be used stylistically as tropes.
Bernadette Malinowski and Winfried Thielmann: Scientific Language in Literature and Science Abstract: Science develops a special kind of language on the basis of its specific requirements: Scientific language. In the course of literary reception of science, science as well as its language finds entry into literary texts. These phenomena will be illuminated in the following paper – by Bernadette Malinowski from a literary-studies perspective and by Winfried Thielmann from a linguistics perspective. The specificity of scientific language is particularly evident in the fact that scientific requirements – such as the negotiation of of basic scientific activities – is carried out with common linguistic resources, which, particularly in scientific debates, are subject to a single-language and knowledge-culture-specific use. And yet these specificities have so far received little significant examination, in linguistics or in scientific reflections on linguistic assumptions. Correcting this situation, the examination of a few passages from Darwin’s Origin of Species, shows that this text clearly draws on processes of literary text-structuring, and offers a – typically Anglo-saxon – eristic arsenal. The introductory passages from Gottfried Keller’s epigrams make clear that in the second half of the nineteenth century, literature – in contrast to science – has long been a central locus for critical positions on science and scientific language.
Dirk Vanderbeke: Reflections on Ästhetics in Literary Studies and Science Abstract: Since the beginning of modern history of science in the seventeenth century, and the corresponding demand for a simple and neutral scientific language, aesthetic perception has traditionally been associated with literature and art, whereas science strives for truth rather than beauty. This simple division was, however, put into question by representatives of both fields. Just as literature has always also dealt with the search for truth, so scientific work also contains moments and phenomena, theories and mathematical equations, which evoke an aesthetic response, and are perceived as beautiful. These experiences and their conditions will be investigated in the following, setting aesthetic concepts in connection with literary studies.
Holger Helbig: Reduction and Rhetoric: On the Meaning of Things in Exhibitions Abstract: One and the same thing can take on multiple meanings as an exhibit in multiple exhibitions. One and the same thing can be used to represent highly various themes, or make various meanings. What an object in an exhibition means, depends essentially on two contexts: that from which the thing has been taken, and that in which it is set as an object. We may generalize, that the staging of the exhibition reduces the role of the original context, and charges the new context rhetorically. From this assumption we can develop and test a descriptive model for the strategies of museum presentations, using the example of a pineapple-preparation in two exhibitions.
Manuel Illi: Take Mathematics by the Words -- Give Numbers to Poetry. German-language lyrics and the speech of mathematics Abstract: Lyrical texts sometimes adapt language used in science and mathematics. This paper investigates whether one can properly speak of a special „language of mathematics,“ and what its special characteristics are. Considering poems by Hans Magnus Enzensberger, Hans Manz, Oskar Pastior, Max Bense and Thomas Sibley, I will show through examples the ways in which elements of mathematical scientific language are used as means of lyric language-formation.
Aura Heydenreich: Cosmos or Chaos? The Saving of the Phenomena in the Labyrinth of the Text. Plato’s Cosmology and Eudoxos’ Astronomy in Raoul Schrott‘s „Finis Terrae“ (1995) Abstract: Raoul Schrott‘s novel Finis Terrae sets Plato‘s cosmological myths from The Republic and Timaeus to describe the creation of the world according to poetological models, such as the discourse model of the Labyrinth, to connect them with the description of the creation of a literary work. Thus he elaborates on how the structures of works emerge from the world’s creation myths. The following will demonstrate the structural models that form the basis of the novel, and how they are simultaneously poetic-mythical and mathematic-scientific in origin: Plato’s cosmology and Eudoxos von Knidos‘ astronomy. The aim is to represent how in the literary text these models are layered over one another in palimpsest-style, and thus to reenact the play of calculation and accident, of chaos and symmetry, that is inherent in each mythos that renarrates the creation; as also for each theoretical model that seeks to calculate the contingence of creation through explanatory organizing structures.
Part II: Biology and Neuroscience – Evolution and Ideas of Men
Caroline Welsh: The Brain in Science and Contemporary Literature. Alternatives to neurobiological constructivism Abstract: The paper examines scientific and literary counter-proposals to neurobiological constructivism, and inquires into the poetological and anthropological implications of brain research. The first part addresses Thomas Fuchs’s criticism of the Cartesian inheritance of cognitive neuroscience, and his repositioning of subjectivity in living organisms, as well as Aris Fioreto’s and Durs Grünbein’s discussions of literature as „alternative brain research“; emphasizing the importance of an internal subjective inner perspective for the embedding of neurobiological knowledge of the brain in anthropologically relevant contexts. In the second part, two of Grünbein’s poems about brains in Schadelbasislektion are, in light of history of science, displaced from their previous assignment to the context of neurobiological constructivism, and set in relation to research on the meaning of the subcortical brain regions in the framework of the neurochemistry and psychopharmacology of the 1980s.
Antje Kley and Karin Höpker: Literature and Knowledge: ‚Life Science‘ and ‚The Pursuit of Happiness‘ in Richard Powers’ „Generosity: An Enhancement“ (2009) Abstract: What does contemporary literature contribute to reflection on knowledge-production, its mediation and its social relevance? A reading of Richard Powers‘ science novel Generosity: An Enhancement approaches these questions. The text creates a fictional world in which the pursuit of happiness has become the reigning social logic. In a forcefield of optimization constraints and far-reaching economization of the social, medicine and industry are tailored to the need-profiles of individual end-users, who have themselves become entrepreneurial projects. Powers‘ novel shows a biomedically-shaped society, in which thinking in terms of future probabilities and statistical distributions drives an expanded dynamic of self-empowerment and biopolitical self-regulation. In a narrative experiment, the novel advocates a conscious interaction with the contingency of world-explanation models and with the ethical and political implications that arise when we idolize specific forms of knowledge-production.
Patrick Müller: Evolutionary Theory and Darwins Cris(i/e)s of Faith in Harry Thompson‘s „This Thing of Darkness“ (2005) Abstract: This paper begins by examining the state of research on the religious implications of Darwinian evolutionary theory, and against this background undertakes a deeper generic analysis of Harry Thompson’s historical novel This Thing of Darkness. The in-depth analysis of the text first addresses a dialogue between Darwin and the captain of the HMS Beagle, Robert FitzRoy, which develops, in an intellectual tour de force, the various arguments for and against the biblical creation myth, as well as the Darwinian theory of evolution. In addition to these intellectual-historical components, the narrative implications of various world-explanation models are also considered. The text does not only criticize British colonial politics (among others) by incorporating postcolonial theories, but also illuminates the potential of religiously motivated, teleological storylines or non-linear plots based on scientifically proven knowledge of the world. However, in spite of the fact that the text shows the triumph of Darwinian theory against the collapse of FitzRoy’s ideals, no explanatory model is preferred. Moreover, it becomes clear that a one-sided world view that emphasizes the conflict potential between religion and science deprives itself of fundamental insights affiliated with the respective other.
Harald Neumeyer: Frank Schätzing‘s „Der Schwarm“ (2004) and the ‚terra incognita‘ deep sea Abstract: This essay explores the relation between Frank Schätzing’s sea-novel Der Schwarm and current marine science. In a first step, the objects, frameworks, problems and argumentation-forms of marine research are presented. A second step demonstrates that Schätzing’s novel, far from being interested only in the content of oceanography, also discusses methodological problems and taxonomic gaps, technical requirements and specific perspectives, key processes and explanatory patterns of marine research. This „scientific narration,“ which thematizes its own fallibility, becomes in the course of the novel separated from a „mythical narration,“ which imagines an intentional entitiy with the discovery of Yrr, which within the fictional construction of the novel makes possible a total knowledge of all catastrophes arising in the ocean.
Monika Gänßbauer: On Goldbugs and Schistosomiasis: A view of the literary work of Chinese Author Can Xue Abstract: The following paper explores the connections between science and literature in the works of the contemporary Chinese author Can Xue, approaching her work from a sinological perspective. In the Chinese context there was no Literature and Science debate, as we know it in the Euro-American world. In the People’s Republic of China the social and literary situation has a very differently character, which does not mean that in China there was no debate between questions of literature and science. Can Xue’s work shows a very subtle discussion of such questions. An additional factor is that (unlike in the West) China first arrived at a differentiation of specialized scientific disciplines in the course of violent incursions of Western powers in the 19th century. Previously, other categories for the understanding of reality and knowledge dominated in China. Can Xue’s work now not only reveals a fascination with biological and medical concepts, it also addresses the traditional cosmological system of speculation, as well as the elements of Marxist-Maoist discourses still dominant in the People’s Republic of China today, and the still-spreading belief in science, reflected in critical-ironic fashion. These are especially characteristic of her work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Call for Contributions, Seitenstecher magazine #2: "Dark Energy"
Dear authors,
after the successful launch of the first issue of Seitenstechen the homunculus publishing house is preparing the next issue of its literary magazine. This time, the issue will be produced in cooperation with ELINAS (Erlangen Center for Literature and Natural Science), who will serve as co-publisher. The topic of this year’s issue is Dark Energy. For this purpose, a short introduction by Dr. Aura Heydenreich, founding member of ELINAS:
95% of the sources of gravitational forces in the expanding universe are still not known. 73% of those constitute the fictive entity of today’s cosmology: Dark Energy. This energy seems to be necessary to make the current cosmological standard model work; however, we do not really know what this energy is. Its existence is presumed since there is an effect we can attribute to it: the accelerated expansion of the universe. Therefore dark energy is the biggest unknown quantity of today’s scientific cosmology. All theoretical experiments conducted by astrophysics, particle phsyics, general relativity theory and quantum field theory aimed to understand dark energy, contradict each other. If one could define the nature of dark energy, it would provide valuable information on the past and future development of the universe, for which we have developed several theories: Big Chill, Big Rip … Still, those vacancies ask to be filled by literary creations.
For this issue, we are looking for (preferably unpublished) literary texts or excerpts dealing with the astrophysical phenomenon of Dark Energy. Texts may treat the topic concretely, as a motive or associatively – the Unknown, the Unexplainable, ideas of the Beginning, the energetic are all united in this model. There are no restrictions regarding genre or text form (we will take poems, prose, dialogues, plays, visual poetry – illustrations are welcome as well).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
History of Physics Time: Tuesday 16:00 - 18:00 Ort: SR 01.683 (Physics Department, Staudtstr. 7)
The aim of the seminar is to learn to read, understand and situate in historical context important works from the history of physics. The selection is oriented to the first introductions of key concepts and natural laws, such as entropy (Clausius, Boltzmann), field (Faraday) and relativity (Galileo, Einstein), but also to the first mathematical modelling of important theories such as electrodynamics (Maxwell), gravitation (Einstein) or quantum dynamics (Heisenberg). Relevant experiments as well as important applications will also be discussed. The seminar thus provides an overview of the history of physics. A precise terminological and conceptual understanding of physics is a necessary prerequisite to understanding the perennial efforts to formulate its significance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BSLS Annual Conference 2016 Date: 7.-9. April 2016 Place: University of Birmingham
The eleventh annual conference of the British Society for Literature and Science will take place at the University of Birmingham, from Thursday 7 April until Saturday 9 April 2016.
Keynote talks will be given by Professor Harriet Ritvo (MIT), Professor Sharon Ruston (University of Lancaster), and Professor Alice Roberts (University of Birmingham).
The BSLS invites proposals for twenty-minute papers, or panels of three papers, on any subjects within the field of literature and science.
In addition, we are hoping to put together sessions with looser, non-traditional formats, and would welcome proposals from any person or persons interested in making presentations of approximately ten minutes from notes rather than completed papers. Our hope is that the latter format will encourage longer Q&A sessions with more discussion. If you have a topic or research area which would suit such a discussion, we would also like to hear from you.
The 10th European Society for Literature, Science and the Arts Conference. Theme: Control Time: June 14-17, 2016 Place: Stockholm
International Conference of the Academia Europaea: Symmetry, Proportion and Seriality. The Semantics of Mirroring and Repetition in Science and the Arts Date: 26.-28. May 2016 Place: University of Freiburg
Symmetry is one of the key factors in a variety of sciences and humanities subjects. Equations must be symmetrical; in architecture symmetry is a basic design feature; linguists discover iconic and symmetrical relationships in their objects of study; in chemistry and physics symmetrical and asymmetrical designs play an important role; in music and all the arts symmetry is often considered the basis of aesthetic quality. There are also several types of symmetry that one might want to distinguish. Symmetry can be set off against, but also paired with, two other features that play a similar role in the sciences and the arts: proportion and seriality. Exact symmetry in some instances is too neat, too boring, or simply not possible, yet a set of proportional relationships may be deemed crucial to a particular effect. Proportion can thus be regarded as a more general framework that allows one to set items in relationships to one another, with symmetry being the most perfect of these relationships. The visual arts, especially film and dance, employ proportion and symmetry as kinetic rather than merely static modes. As regards seriality, it is a recursive application of symmetry and repetition, but also a type of design that operates dynamically rather than statically. Besides its obvious relevance to the arts in experiments in seriality in (post)modernist painting, music and literature, seriality plays a central role in mathematics and physics.
The high-profile speakers at this conference come from a wide range of discipline and they share a commitment to cross-disciplinary dialogue. They will compare concepts of symmetry, proportion and seriality across the humanities-sciences divide; they will explore the historical dimensions and changes in taste that affect the understanding of these terms and concepts; they will discuss them as culture-specific phenomena, comparing ideas of symmetry and proportion across different global cultures; finally, they will explore why it is that symmetry is so important to our minds and our language, indeed to the design of our bodies and brains.
The conference is organized into three sections, each starting off with a plenary lecture and extended plenary discussions between speakers from different disciplines. Speakers at this conference include scholars from the fields of musicology, theoretical physics, literary studies, art history, neuroscience, and theatre and performance studies. Please see the space below for the full conference programme.
Symposium der Gesellschaft für Wissenschaftsgeschichte (53. Jahrstagung): Wissenschaft schreiben Date: 5.-7. May 2016 Place: Düsseldorf
Schriftlichkeit stellt für die Wissenschaften ein wesentliches Charakteristikum in ihrer Selbst- und Fremdwahrnehmung dar. Praktisches, theoretisches, ordnendes, experimentelles, gesammeltes und anderes Wissen wird über das Schreiben kodiert, normiert und letztendlich als Wissenschaft überliefert. Der besondere Wert des Schriftlichen gilt für alle Wissenschaften und jede einzelne wissenschaftliche Disziplin hat in der Geschichte ihr eigene Formen des Schreibens gefunden und entwickelt. Diese reichen von stark formalisierten Graphemen bis hin zu von Neologismen geprägten komplizierten Satzkonstruktionen. Das Jahressymposium der GWG wendet sich nun genau dem Prozess des Schreibens von Wissenschaft zu. Schreibtechniken, Schreibformen, Formalismen, Terminologien und der Weg vom Gegenstand zur Schrift stellen nur einen kleinen Ausschnitt des Spektrums dar, das unter dem Titel „Wissenschaft schreiben“ verhandelt werden soll. Das Verständnis von „Wissenschaft“ in der Figur des „Wissenschaft Schreibens“ fassen wir nicht nur für dieses Symposium bewusst breit und inklusiv, um möglichst viele Formen der wissenschaftlichen Schriftlichkeit erfassen zu können. Die Beiträge des Symposiums sollen neben der Geschichte der Medizin-, Naturwissenschafts- und Technikgeschichte auch andere Wissenschaften wie z.B. die Geschichte der Rechtswissenschaften, Musikwissenschaft und Wirtschaftswissenschaft umfassen. Auf diese Weise hoffen wir, neben einer Reihe von Besonderheiten und Einzelfallstudien zu einem umfassenden Verständnis des Schreibens von Wissenschaft zu gelangen. Wie schon in den letzten Symposien möchte die GWG zusätzlich zu dem von eingeladenen Referentinnen und Referenten bestrittenen Programm wieder die Möglichkeit bieten, Vortragsvorschläge einzureichen, die sich des Rahmenthemas in innovativer und kreativer Weise annehmen. Mögliche Themen sind - Formen der Schriftlichkeit in den Wissenschaften wie zum Beispiel Texte, Grapheme oder Symbole - Die Formalisierung von Schreibprozessen - Narration und Narrative in der Geschichte der Wissenschaften und ihren schriftlichen Repräsentationen - Das Be-, Um- und Ein-Schreiben von wissenschaftlichen Themen, Inhalten und Motiven in „außerwissenschaftliche“ Texte sowie die Übernahme bestimmter Schreibformen aus „außerwissenschaftlichen“ Texten in die Wissenschaften Besonders gewünscht sind konkrete Fallstudien, die sich an die theoretischen Debatten zum Schreiben in den Wissenschaften anschließen. Die Auswahl erfolgt nach Sichtung der Abstracts durch den Vorstand und Beirat der GWG. Gerade junge Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler möchten wir zur Bewerbung mit einem Beitrag ermutigen, da das Symposium die Chance bietet, auch laufende Forschungsvorhaben einem Expertenpublikum zur Diskussion zu stellen.
Folglich bitten wir um Einreichung von Vortragsvorschlägen. Bitte senden Sie Ihre Vorschläge als Worddatei (Schrift Arial 11, 1.5 zeilig, maximal 350 Worte) zusammen mit dem Autorennamen und Institutionszugehörigkeit bis zum 15.02.2016 an den Schriftführer der Gesellschaft Prof. Dr. Philipp Osten (p.osten@uke.de).
XIV Ometeca Conference—State of the Art/Working Session on the Relations between the Humanities and Science in the Hispanic World Date: 6.-9. April 2016 Place: The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (USA)
The Call for Papers, Registration Form, and Lodging information for the conference are available at the Ometeca Institute’s new website: http://ometeca.org (under those tabs). The extended deadlines for receipt of e-mailed abstracts or panel suggestions is Feb. 26, 2016; for the mailed Registration Form and fee, after notification of acceptance, it is Mar. 7, 2016 (postmarked).
The Ometeca Institute is a non-profit organization devoted to examining the relationship of humanities and science Ometeca: a word from Nahuatl, meaning “two in one”: humanities and science
The Institute’s purposes are: To explore the connections between the humanities and science through our scholarly journal, Ometeca, publications of pamphlets and books, and through workshops and conferences. See “Journal,” “Publications,” and “Conferences: Working Sessions.” To generate theory about a unified view of the humanities and science. This would help create and integrate a new paradigm. To probe the interrelationships of the humanities and science in Hispanic (Spanish American, Peninsular, and U.S. Latin@), as well as Luso-Brazilian literatures and cultures. Such a transdisciplinary focus provides a limitless resource which has not been fully plumbed to date.
Faith — religion, spirituality — is a component of the humanities. Thus, another possible focus for theory, conference papers, etc., is to compare faith and science, since the Ometeca Institute hopes to foster interaction between the humanities and sciences. However, the Ometeca Institute is non-sectarian and ecumenical in a broad sense: it does not espouse any particular view.
Zürcher Forschungsprojekt „conditio extraterrestris“: Kontakt. Lesen und Schreiben im Weltall. Time: 23.-25.5.2016 Place: Old Observatory, Zurich
Since Kepler, the astronomical exploration of outer space has been indissolubly linked to the origination of a phantasy of the extraterrestrial. Indeed, the constellations of planets have long occupied the human mind; yet, not as much as how they are, or could be, inhabited. In this regard, literary imagination undertakes a coordinating function since it conveys images of alien worlds and beings, while its narratives outline the inhabited galaxy as a phenomenal order bound to carry meaning for human beings and their knowledge (from the Christian theology of creation to the theory of evolution). The project investigates the creation and the mediation of extraterrestrial space in three steps. First, it examines the poetic strategies, which assisted early modern literature to moderate the conflict between astronomy’s evidence for the multiplicity of planets and the theological truth of humankind as being at the centre of creation. Second, the project locates the history of intergalactic communicative media within the perspective of the history of a theory of modern inspiration. Third, the project carefully considers, and clarifies, the impact of the rise of the “extraterrestrial reader” on the development of new forms of narrative in European literature since the 18th century.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Einstein Fellowship 2017 Awarded by the Einstein Forum and the Daimler and Benz Foundation
The Einstein Forum and the Daimler and Benz Foundation are offering a fellowship for outstanding young thinkers who wish to pursue a project in a different field from that of their previous research. The purpose of the fellowship is to support those who, in addition to producing superb work in their area of specialization, are also open to other, interdisciplinary approaches – following the example set by Albert Einstein. The fellowship includes living accommodations for five to six months in the garden cottage of Einstein`s own summerhouse in Caputh, Brandenburg, only a short distance away from the universities and academic institutions of Potsdam and Berlin. The fellow will receive a stipend of EUR 10,000 and reimbursement of travel expenses. Candidates must be under 35 and hold a university degree in the humanities, in the social sciences, or in the natural sciences. Applications for 2017 should include a CV, a two-page project proposal, and two letters of recommendation. All documents must be received by April 15, 2016. At the end of the fellowship period, the fellow will be expected to present his or her project in a public lecture at the Einstein Forum and at the Daimler and Benz Foundation. The Einstein Fellowship is not intended for applicants who wish to complete an academic study they have already begun. A successful application must demonstrate the quality, originality, and feasibility of the proposed project, as well as the superior intellectual development of the applicant. It is not relevant whether the applicant has begun working toward, or currently holds, a PhD. PLEASE NOTE THAT NO FELLOWSHIPS WILL BE GIVEN FOR DISSERTATION RESEARCH. THE PROPOSED PROJECT MUST BE SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT IN CONTENT, AND PREFERABLY FIELD AND FORM, FROM THE APPLICANT’S PREVIOUS WORK.
Applications should be submitted by mail to:
Prof. Dr. Susan Neiman Einstein Forum Am Neuen Markt 7 14467 Potsdam Germany
For more information, call or fax the Einstein Forum at: phone: +49-331-271780 fax: +49-331-2717827
[Click here for the website]
|
|
|
|
|
Impressum: Erlangen Center for Literature and Natural Sciences Prof. Dr. Klaus Mecke, Dr. Aura Heydenreich Staudtstraße 7, Gebäude B3, 91058 Erlangen If you do not like to receive this newsletter: Unsubscribe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|